GameAmp Fansite Network Gamer Shirts, GameAmp T-Shirts
Change Game Sites   
About GameAmp, Inc GameAmp Staff Register for a free account
GameAmp Login GameAmp Password
GameAmp Homepage
GameAmp Game MapsGameAmp Game ListLatest Video Game NewsVisit the Video Game ForumsGame Item AuctionsFind Gamer FriendsGame Screenshots
Video Games Subnav
GameAmp Information

GameAmp: Ice/Em Vs. Fire/Em

clear gif
Forum >> Archetype Discussions >> Tanker >> Ice/Em Vs. Fire/Em

 
User Message
X'aos Profile
X'aos
View Profile of X'aos
Posts: 1
Joined: 07/10/2007
Credibility: 0 pts
Ice/Em Vs. Fire/Em 

So i was wondering which would be a better Scranker build. A Fire/Energy Melee. Or Ice/Energy Melee. What i am mostly focusing on is max damage output, as well as surviablity (who isnt). Also which would be better for shifting over to aggro magager at higher levels (maybe). Thanks in advance.
07/22/07 16:14 Login to rate this user's post!
giles202 Profile
giles202
View Profile of giles202
GameAmp Staff
Posts: 11
Joined: 05/31/2006
Credibility: 0 pts
RE: Ice/Em Vs. Fire/Em 

QUOTE
So i was wondering which would be a better Scranker build. A Fire/Energy Melee. Or Ice/Energy Melee. What i am mostly focusing on is max damage output, as well as surviablity (who isnt). Also which would be better for shifting over to aggro magager at higher levels (maybe). Thanks in advance.


Fire/Em hands down, an insanely large amount of damage, can take a GREAT beating and at higher lvls can tank AV's. Yep.



This is Paramore:

If you don't know them, why are you reading this?
07/22/07 16:17 Login to rate this user's post!
X'aos Profile
X'aos
View Profile of X'aos
Posts: 1
Joined: 07/10/2007
Credibility: 0 pts
RE: Ice/Em Vs. Fire/Em 

10 for two reasons.
1st. for responding so fastly.
2nd. for actually awnsering my question. THANKS!
Feel free to comment on the build(s)
debate is still open



Triumph
Mutation-Stone 50 (Stone/Kinetics/Ice)
Proffessor.Benaz 50 (Fire/Rad/Fire)
Granite Guardian 38 (Stone/Fire)
Energy-Burn 33 (Fire/Energy blaster)
Dark Matter 30 (Tri Warshade)

Freedom
Ember Temptress 50 (Fire/Kin Corruptor)
X'aos 50 (Dark/Dark Defender)
Ice Bot-KLR 38 (Ice/SS Tanker)
Metamorphix 33 (Spine/WP scrapper)
Kizu Mecki 20 (Spine/SR Scrapper)
07/22/07 16:22 Login to rate this user's post!
bigspeer Profile
bigspeer
View Profile of bigspeer
Posts: 3
Joined: 02/22/2006
Credibility: 0 pts
RE: Ice/Em Vs. Fire/Em 

QUOTE
So i was wondering which would be a better Scranker build. A Fire/Energy Melee. Or Ice/Energy Melee. What i am mostly focusing on is max damage output, as well as surviablity (who isnt). Also which would be better for shifting over to aggro magager at higher levels (maybe). Thanks in advance.


Ice Armor is the best aggro management primary for tankers that is available.

Fire Armor isn't too bad for aggro management, but it's not ice. The thing that makes fire/ such a high damaging set is that it has access to a second build-up in it's primary, which no other armor gets.

Energy Melee the highest damage dealing melee attack in the game in Energy Transfer.

Fire/Energy would be the better "Scranker" just by definition of the word. Scranker implies a tanker who focuses mostly on damage output trying to be like a scrapper and has a slightly lower survivability rate.

Ice/Energy should be considered an offensive tanker because ice tanks have a much greater rate of survivability.



My New House - Almost Done Moving In...
07/22/07 16:36 Login to rate this user's post!

clear gif
Don't Forget! - Rate users posts to reward or demerit their posts with Credibility!
GameAmp Footer