NakedApe
Posts: 0
Joined: 07/01/2004
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| Newnet in 1.6 final vs beta8? |
|
|
|
Was anything changed in the netcode between beta8 and final release? Cause 1.6 final really screwed up movement for me when I tried it today. Basically it felt like playing with high and unstable ping. Beta8 didn't feel at all like this.
Aim also felt decidedly strange and disabling newnet clientside didn't change anything.
This is on a server that is on the same 100Mbps network segment as me so the quality of the connection is extremely good (for me). Any ideas to why this might happen and where to start troubleshooting?
|
| 03/19/05 19:09 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
Powerslave
Posts: 0
Joined: 05/31/2004
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| Re: Newnet in 1.6 final vs beta8? |
|
|
|
I just played on 1.6 with 180 ping and it felt fine, you were there. :>
|
| 03/19/05 20:59 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
solstice
Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2004
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| Re: Newnet in 1.6 final vs beta8? |
|
|
|
i would almost say its "definately" NOT utcomp. i've played utcomp 1.6 beta3 to final with 180 ping. and its always been smooth - except beta3's bugs
http://profiles.myspace.com/users/6686017
|
| 03/19/05 22:08 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
NakedApe
Posts: 0
Joined: 07/01/2004
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| Re: Newnet in 1.6 final vs beta8? |
|
|
|
| QUOTE | | i would almost say its \"definately\" NOT utcomp. i've played utcomp 1.6 beta3 to final with 180 ping. and its always been smooth - except beta3's bugs |
UTComp is the only thing that was changed. I'd certainly expect the kind of things that happened to happen if my ping was 180 but my ping is ~8, I have a LAN quality connection to that server. These things just do not happen under those circumstances.
Powerslave: yes, I know, GG. But the code still felt crap to me. :P
|
| 03/21/05 08:22 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
chachu
Posts: 0
Joined: 01/10/2005
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| Re: Newnet in 1.6 final vs beta8? |
|
|
|
i keep hearing more reports of the dodge bug. in a scrim last night on 404's server, two of our guys got it (newnet on, server and client).
we moved to our server and the problems went away.
maybe it has to do with how the server config interacts with enhanced netcode?
-chu
|
| 03/28/05 13:38 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
L0cky
Posts:
Joined: 12/31/1969
Credibility: pts
|
| Re: Newnet in 1.6 final vs beta8? |
|
|
|
Works fine here. Maybe you were having a bad day? :P
|
| 03/28/05 16:28 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
vynum
Posts:
Joined: 12/31/1969
Credibility: pts
|
| Re: Newnet in 1.6 final vs beta8? |
|
|
|
It does say in the "reademe", that if you don't like it, just disable it. Also, if the other version felt fine to you then I suggest you go back to that one. Why try and fix someting if it's not br0ke?
|
| 04/03/05 14:17 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
