| User |
Message |
DarkNshY
Posts: 23
Joined: 01/13/2006
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| Realtemp vs Core Temp vs Everest |
|
|
|
Core Temp and Everest shows the same on my new E8400 CPU and Realtemp about 10 Degrese (spelling) less then the others.
U got any idea of which is the most accurate?
|
| 07/01/08 05:02 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
RazoMoto
Posts: 0
Joined: 06/21/2008
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| RE: Realtemp vs Core Temp vs Everest |
|
|
|
Just 50/50 them? if one's ten degrees lower, then just think its 5 degrees lower, that way their both off by 5 degrees.
one says 10, one says 20, what do you estimate? 15.
~Lucky Mac Luckerton~ PH.D In Chaos, M.A. In Madness, B.A. In Insanity (with a minor in World Domination)
|
| 07/01/08 06:04 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
DarkNshY
Posts: 23
Joined: 01/13/2006
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| RE: Realtemp vs Core Temp vs Everest |
|
|
|
Kay ;)
duleet @ xfire
|
| 07/01/08 06:19 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
kingoffly
Posts: 1
Joined: 06/05/2006
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| RE: Realtemp vs Core Temp vs Everest |
|
|
|
razomoto is right but i would take everest as true
i use it for ages now
for overclocking my computer and it never failed me
(__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into
(")_(") your signature to help him gain world domination.
|
| 07/01/08 06:19 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
hairychimpdude
Posts: 9
Joined: 04/19/2006
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| RE: Realtemp vs Core Temp vs Everest |
|
|
|
this thread kind of explains why:
explaination
roughly, its all down to a processor value that the programs use, and it isnt given out by intel, so the programs kind of guess it up to a point. the value also seems to be different from model to model and even from processors in the same range. at the moment, it doesnt look like you'll be able to find the definitive answer until intel publish all the relevant data.
IGN: Flaming Nimmy
My Gallery: DeviantArt
|
| 07/01/08 06:22 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
Liquide
Posts: 7
Joined: 04/22/2007
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| RE: Realtemp vs Core Temp vs Everest |
|
|
|
| QUOTE | razomoto is right but i would take everest as true
i use it for ages now
for overclocking my computer and it never failed me |
how do you know it never failed you?
and it doesnt have to be right if you used it for ages ;)
thaskippy: | QUOTE | | omg... you should be the new dalai lama 0.o |
Mai Englisch is'nt verry good, so plaese keep taht in you're minds.
|
| 07/01/08 06:23 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
hairychimpdude
Posts: 9
Joined: 04/19/2006
Credibility: 0 pts
|
| RE: Realtemp vs Core Temp vs Everest |
|
|
|
the only 100% accurate way of getting a "true" temperature is using an external temperature probe between the heatsink and cpu die, but this will only give you the temp of the outside of the core, and an overall temp for a multi core system, not individual core temps. also with the protective part on the top of all processors these days that will also interefere, not too mention the tim/thermal paste.
soooooo,
the only thing to do is use your temp readings as a rough guide on how effective your cooling is, to measure the difference between water and air cooling say.
i cant stress this enough it really doesnt matter what temp your cpu is running at as long as it's not high.
IGN: Flaming Nimmy
My Gallery: DeviantArt
|
| 07/01/08 06:34 |
Login to rate this user's post! |
